Open Question

Jim Cramer, this one is for you:

Read your article about Wind power earlier today. Great article.

Problem: You have completely abandoned your long-term thesis for BAM (Brookfield
Asset Management). This makes no sense to me. You can say that the company is
hurting all you want- it isn't. They are recroding record cash flows and it
seems the market is finally once again seeing the value in BAM at these levels.
Bruce Flatt is the best asset manager out there.

Why are you not bringing BAM into these conversations? They own one heck of a
lot of land that is used to generate wind power, among many other types of land
they own.

I think you at least owe your viewers an explanation as to why you have
abandoned BAM. I think you will regret this in a few years.

Thanks for all you do...

Asked by ScottF 3 months ago - 1 answers - 49 views
previous pagePage 1 of 1next page
Go to page:go

he spoke about it on the show a month ago, and said he thought it was too risky
here and was heading lower. stock was at 27 at the time. now 35 . i have been in
and out for over a yr, i personally like the stock, and once the credit, housing
mess clears this thing is off to the races 50 ..

supposidly next brookshire

Rate Now: 1 2 3 4 Average Rating: 0.00 / 0

previous pagePage 1 of 1next page
Go to page:go