I've owned this stock since the Russian melt down in the late '90s. It has
given me knots in my gut a dozen times, but every time it's left me wishing I'd
had the nerve to buy when it had been down. This time I did and of course, I'm
down on those recent buys ($29-35) but those old shares that I still hold at a
cost basis of 84 cents make me keep the faith.

CRAMER: WE HAVE NEVER TRUSTED THE COMMIES. WE DO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEIR ECONOMY
IS GROWING AT A RAPID PACE. YOU RECOMMENDED THIS STOCK RECENTLY, I THINK IT WAS
ABOUT A MONTH AGO. YOU CAN'T JUST SAY WE DON'T TRUST THE RUSKIES ANYMORE AND
LEAVE IT AT THAT. I DO MY HOMEWORK AND I LISTEN TO YOUR SHOW ALMOST EVERY NIGHT
ON XM (I'M A TRUCK DRIVER, SO I SOMETIMES HAVE TO WORK WHILE YOU'RE ON.) BASED
ON THE FUNDIES THAT I CAN FIND, THIS STOCK IS A SOLID BUY. BUT, YOUR ATTITUDE
TOWARD THIS STOCK IS DECIDEDLY NEGATIVE. THERE IS DEFINITELY A DISCONNECT
BETWEEN WHAT US HOME GAMERS PERCEIVE FROM THE LIMITED NEWS STORIES THAT COME OUR
WAY AND WHAT YOU GET FROM YOUR WALL STREET SOURCES. I'VE READ EVERY STORY ON VIP
FOR THE LAST THREE MONTHS AND I DIDN'T PICK UP ON A McCARTHY STYLE ANTI-COMMIE
SENTIMENT, SO I DON'T THINK SAYING "WE DON'T TRUST RUSSIA" IS AN APPROPRIATE
RESPONSE. ELABORATE PLEASE.

this one is starting too look real cheap long term,,,i also like chl both should
have a long growth basis.

Were they ever..ha?
Susan

russia is no longer trusted ,..period end of story

I am there with you. One of my core positions @ 32. I trimmed a little on the up
today to protect if they head back south tomorrow.