Comments for UNG - Stockpickr! Your Source for Stock Ideas

Comments for UNG

Added By	Comments	Type	Date Added
barrons3	Natural Gas (UNG) inventories are at historically high levels, reminds Joe Terranova. Nat gas is clearly challenged. I could only feel bullish if we had arctic temperatures.	Love	October 21, 2009
kenfurches	has got to move up due to green laws and bottomed out pricing	Love	October 07, 2009
barrons3	In the No. 2 spot was U.S. Natural Gas Fund (UNG) a fund Cramer has panned previously. Cramer said this fund has done nothing recently, despite a major move in natural gas. Why? He said the fund, which doesn't buy gas, buys gas futures, which it then must roll over every month, again wiping out gains.	Love	October 01, 2009
barrons3	If you want to play nat gas I’d play it with Apache (APA), adds Guy Adami, not the United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG).	Love	September 23, 2009
Anti-Cramer Fund	Cool, Cool Summer= Cold Cold winter. Says ABBA! Cramer hated it even after Joe theisman says loved it at $14 I just bought at $9.70, cha-ching	Love	September 18, 2009
DONALD F	Natural gas	Love	September 10, 2009
lazyman	price	Love	September 08, 2009
tursk	It would have have been great to jump in right now but the regulators have injected too much uncertainty into commodity etf's	Hate	September 04, 2009
AK_007	Everytime I think this has hit a bottom, it proves me wrong.	Hate	September 02, 2009
LINDA STEWART	LOST MONEY	Hate	September 02, 2009
Travelin Man	gonna have lots of stock	Love	August 30, 2009
barrons3	And don’t play hurricanes by getting long nat gas (UNG). “There’s too much storage and one hurricane won’t change that,” Terranova says.	Love	August 26, 2009
r0ckhouse	tracks NG futures	Love	August 25, 2009
dropslot	Doesn't gas have to go up eventually?	Love	August 21, 2009
barrons3	After two years of aggressive exploration and production -- some would argue too aggressive and too productive -- natural gas looks like it is about to take out $3. (Some of it not being there yet had to do with the United States Natural Gas ETF (UNG), which Don Dion has covered magnificently.)	Love	August 20, 2009
joehogan2	The spread between Nat Gas and oil is too high. The push by Gov't to limit emissions will favor nat gas for electric generation. If there is any pick up in production to fill the empty shelves, demand should pick up.	Love	August 05, 2009
gross641	Fishing with the bottom fishers continually averaging down, only at a 10% loss as of now.	Love	July 23, 2009
mclainjk	Nat Gas will double from $3.25 to $6.50 by winter	Love	July 22, 2009
jcow	rip-off	Hate	July 12, 2009
corkafloat	Gas is the go to energy source sooner or later.	Love	July 12, 2009
mrsyphus	saturated	Hate	July 10, 2009
barrons3	Thiesmann told Fast Money that he’s watching the weather world and specifically hurricane season for trading ideas. Because a bad storm could disrupt drilling in the Gulf Of Mexico, Theismann is bullish of nat gas and he’s playing it with the UNG (UNG) – the nat gas ETF.	Love	July 01, 2009
barrons3	Dion points out that the tail of UNG is about to start wagging the actual natural gas futures, which as we know is incredibly easy to manipulate -- ever hear of Amaranth Advisors? It looks like breakout time despite there being no particular reason for a breakout other than the 18 to 1 ratio that now exists between oil and natural gas -- the largest ever -- and the plethora of recent articles bashing coal.	Love	June 18, 2009
plshan	Spread play	Love	June 15, 2009
Robert Warth	has not moved much since bottom	Love	June 13, 2009
tu54	like what i see	Love	June 11, 2009
keeprickfree	prices heading down	Hate	June 08, 2009
Woodboy	Natural Gas may trade a little lower however we will be using it for a long time to come.	Love	June 05, 2009
jmheff	oversold to oil	Love	June 03, 2009
usercookie66	my favorite since the last run	Love	May 17, 2009